PDA

View Full Version : How Many Shriners Does it Take to Chanhge a Light Bulb?


SCW
08-10-2003, 09:34 AM
How many forum members does it take to change a
lightbulb?

1 to change the light bulb and 1 to post that the
light bulb has been
changed

14 to share similar experiences of changing light
bulbs and how the light
bulb could have been changed differently

7 to caution about the dangers of changing light
bulbs

27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts
about changing light bulbs

53 to flame the spell checkers

41 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light
bulb"

.... another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive

2 industry professionals to inform the group that
the proper term is "lamp"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the
industry, and that "light bulb"
is perfectly correct

156 to email the participant's ISPs complaining
that they are in violation
of their "acceptable use policy"

109 to post that this forum is not about light
bulbs and to please take this
discussion to a lightbulb forum

203 to demand that cross posting to hardware
forum, off-topic forum, and
lightbulb forum about changing light bulbs be
stopped

111 to defend the posting to this forum saying
that we all use light bulbs
and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs
is superior, where to buy
the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs
work best for this technique
and what brands are faulty

27 to post URL's where one can see examples of
different light bulbs

14 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly
and then post the
corrected URL's

3 to post about links they found from the URL's
that are relevant to this
group which makes light bulbs relevant to this
group

33 to link all posts to date, quote them in their
entirety including all
headers and signatures, and add "Me too"

12 to post to the group that they will no longer
post because they cannot
handle the light bulb controversy

19 to quote the "Me too's" to say "Me three"

4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb
FAQ

44 to ask what is a "FAQ"

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a
short time ago?"

143 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs
before posting questions about
light bulbs"

1 new forum member to respond to the original post
6 months from now and
start it all over again

NoSheeples
08-10-2003, 09:47 AM
>light bulb has been
>changed
>
>14 to share similar experiences of changing light
>bulbs and how the light
>bulb could have been changed differently
>
>7 to caution about the dangers of changing light
>bulbs
>
>27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts
>about changing light bulbs
>
>53 to flame the spell checkers
>
>41 to correct spelling/grammar flames
>
>6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light
>bulb"
>
>... another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive
>
>2 industry professionals to inform the group that
>the proper term is "lamp"
>
>15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the
>industry, and that "light bulb"
>is perfectly correct
>
>156 to email the participant's ISPs complaining
>that they are in violation
>of their "acceptable use policy"
>
>109 to post that this forum is not about light
>bulbs and to please take this
>discussion to a lightbulb forum
>
>203 to demand that cross posting to hardware
>forum, off-topic forum, and
>lightbulb forum about changing light bulbs be
>stopped
>
>111 to defend the posting to this forum saying
>that we all use light bulbs
>and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
>
>306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs
>is superior, where to buy
>the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs
>work best for this technique
>and what brands are faulty
>
>27 to post URL's where one can see examples of
>different light bulbs
>
>14 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly
>and then post the
>corrected URL's
>
>3 to post about links they found from the URL's
>that are relevant to this
>group which makes light bulbs relevant to this
>group
>
>33 to link all posts to date, quote them in their
>entirety including all
>headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
>
>12 to post to the group that they will no longer
>post because they cannot
>handle the light bulb controversy
>
>19 to quote the "Me too's" to say "Me three"
>
>4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb
>FAQ
>
>44 to ask what is a "FAQ"
>
>4 to say "didn't we go through this already a
>short time ago?"
>
>143 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs
>before posting questions about
>light bulbs"
>
>1 new forum member to respond to the original post
>6 months from now and
>start it all over again
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Good ****. Very funny, and 80% true. ;o)

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what is for lunch. Liberty is
a well armed lamb protesting the vote."

Aaron Draper
08-10-2003, 09:59 AM
Brilliant! Don't forget the 12 posters who condemn the original replier for
top-posting. :-)

--
Aaron Draper
www.baileyscomet.net
----------
"Does he think he's Ponce d' Moongel?"
-Sam Savoca

Frisco
08-10-2003, 11:16 AM
You misspelled "change".

And 4 more posts because I top-posted this reply.

Paul


On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:34:06 GMT, "SCW" <adsl001@verizon.net> wrote:

>How many forum members does it take to change a
>lightbulb?
>
>1 to change the light bulb and 1 to post that the
>light bulb has been
>changed
>
>14 to share similar experiences of changing light
>bulbs and how the light
>bulb could have been changed differently
>
>7 to caution about the dangers of changing light
>bulbs
>
>27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts
>about changing light bulbs
>
>53 to flame the spell checkers
>
>41 to correct spelling/grammar flames
>
>6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light
>bulb"
>
>... another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive
>
>2 industry professionals to inform the group that
>the proper term is "lamp"
>
>15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the
>industry, and that "light bulb"
>is perfectly correct
>
>156 to email the participant's ISPs complaining
>that they are in violation
>of their "acceptable use policy"
>
>109 to post that this forum is not about light
>bulbs and to please take this
>discussion to a lightbulb forum
>
>203 to demand that cross posting to hardware
>forum, off-topic forum, and
>lightbulb forum about changing light bulbs be
>stopped
>
>111 to defend the posting to this forum saying
>that we all use light bulbs
>and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
>
>306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs
>is superior, where to buy
>the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs
>work best for this technique
>and what brands are faulty
>
>27 to post URL's where one can see examples of
>different light bulbs
>
>14 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly
>and then post the
>corrected URL's
>
>3 to post about links they found from the URL's
>that are relevant to this
>group which makes light bulbs relevant to this
>group
>
>33 to link all posts to date, quote them in their
>entirety including all
>headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
>
>12 to post to the group that they will no longer
>post because they cannot
>handle the light bulb controversy
>
>19 to quote the "Me too's" to say "Me three"
>
>4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb
>FAQ
>
>44 to ask what is a "FAQ"
>
>4 to say "didn't we go through this already a
>short time ago?"
>
>143 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs
>before posting questions about
>light bulbs"
>
>1 new forum member to respond to the original post
>6 months from now and
>start it all over again
>
>

Rankinfile
08-10-2003, 11:37 AM
Very funny guys. This could apply to practically every forum however.

Anthony Giampa
08-10-2003, 01:48 PM
2, the other one to say how Peart/Portnoy/Mangnini/Bozzio would have done it
better.

--

--
Anthony Giampa; Imperiai2@cox.net
"Pity makes me strong." -- Conan O'Brien


"SCW" <adsl001@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:OBtZa.6294$dm.3496@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
> How many forum members does it take to change a
> lightbulb?
>
> 1 to change the light bulb and 1 to post that the
> light bulb has been
> changed
>
> 14 to share similar experiences of changing light
> bulbs and how the light
> bulb could have been changed differently
>
> 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light
> bulbs
>
> 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts
> about changing light bulbs
>
> 53 to flame the spell checkers
>
> 41 to correct spelling/grammar flames
>
> 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light
> bulb"
>
> ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as anal-retentive
>
> 2 industry professionals to inform the group that
> the proper term is "lamp"
>
> 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the
> industry, and that "light bulb"
> is perfectly correct
>
> 156 to email the participant's ISPs complaining
> that they are in violation
> of their "acceptable use policy"
>
> 109 to post that this forum is not about light
> bulbs and to please take this
> discussion to a lightbulb forum
>
> 203 to demand that cross posting to hardware
> forum, off-topic forum, and
> lightbulb forum about changing light bulbs be
> stopped
>
> 111 to defend the posting to this forum saying
> that we all use light bulbs
> and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
>
> 306 to debate which method of changing light bulbs
> is superior, where to buy
> the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs
> work best for this technique
> and what brands are faulty
>
> 27 to post URL's where one can see examples of
> different light bulbs
>
> 14 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly
> and then post the
> corrected URL's
>
> 3 to post about links they found from the URL's
> that are relevant to this
> group which makes light bulbs relevant to this
> group
>
> 33 to link all posts to date, quote them in their
> entirety including all
> headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
>
> 12 to post to the group that they will no longer
> post because they cannot
> handle the light bulb controversy
>
> 19 to quote the "Me too's" to say "Me three"
>
> 4 to suggest that posters request the light bulb
> FAQ
>
> 44 to ask what is a "FAQ"
>
> 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a
> short time ago?"
>
> 143 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs
> before posting questions about
> light bulbs"
>
> 1 new forum member to respond to the original post
> 6 months from now and
> start it all over again
>
>
>

MMORITZ884
08-10-2003, 06:56 PM
contact George at www.lightbulbguru.com

George Lawrence
08-10-2003, 08:41 PM
OUCH! Laughing lout loud! :-)

--
George Lawrence
George's Drum Shop
1351 S. Cleveland-Massillon Road #21
Copley, Ohio 44321
http://www.GeorgesDrumShop.com
http://www.Drumguru.com
330 670 0800
toll free 866 970 0800

"If thine enemy wrong thee,
buy each of his children a drum."
-Chinese proverb




"MMORITZ884" <mmoritz884@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030810205609.06868.00000364@mb-m03.aol.com...
> contact George at www.lightbulbguru.com

George Lawrence
08-10-2003, 08:42 PM
Don't forget 1 to say that he plays better than all the rest of us and that
we are all a bunch of non light bulb changing choads.

--
George Lawrence
George's Drum Shop
1351 S. Cleveland-Massillon Road #21
Copley, Ohio 44321
http://www.GeorgesDrumShop.com
http://www.Drumguru.com
330 670 0800
toll free 866 970 0800

"If thine enemy wrong thee,
buy each of his children a drum."
-Chinese proverb

Sam Savoca
08-23-2003, 12:14 PM
Funniest thing I've seen since getting back!!!

Sam S.

"SCW" <adsl001@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:OBtZa.6294$dm.3496@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
> How many forum members does it take to change a
> lightbulb?

<snip>