View Full Version : Recording 32bit(float) vs. 24bit
oliverbuhr
11-01-2002, 04:49 AM
Hi,
inspired by the thread about 16/24bit recording I was wondering if 32bit recording would increase quality, not just size.
I'm using Cubase VST32, but i never used the option called "true tape" which seems to be only a sort of compressor.
And I've never seen (or have I overseen?) a 32bit capable recordingcard until now.
Does anybody of you use 32bit? If yes, for what reason?
malsony
11-13-2002, 10:02 PM
i use 24bit.
it's ok, 'cos the difference could seldom be told
BrothersGrim
11-14-2002, 04:53 PM
I agree with Malsony, the human ear can only hear so much. anything above 16 bit is pretty much a really HUGE file and you can't hear the difference... You hear about 8bit, 16bit, 24bit blah, blah but does anyone know what that really means? I do....:)
jon-paul
01-08-2003, 05:04 AM
Well guy this is the situation. you only use 32 bit or 24 bit if you are going to be editing your recording alot and i mean alot. everytime you edit your recording by adding effects or cutting or adding eq bla bla bla you lose some of the quality. if you have recorded a 64 piece orchestra and each one of them needs editing then you could lose a bit of quality and so by recording in 32 bit this gives your editng monouvering space and still means that you end up with a recording that is at CD quality.
I only know this because i am doing a Degree in Music Production in England. if you want to know more Email me directly
Hope this has cleared up the conffusion about 32 and 24 bit recordings
cheers jp
acieed
01-09-2003, 07:23 PM
IMHO, I believe you can hear the difference better when you're recording stuff such as live drums.
Graeme
04-06-2004, 12:21 PM
Originally posted by jon-paul
[B]Well guy this is the situation. you only use 32 bit or 24 bit if you are going to be editing your recording alot and i mean alot. everytime you edit your recording by adding effects or cutting or adding eq bla bla bla you lose some of the quality.
Well - almost right. If you are going to be doing a lot of post processing on a file, then 32 bit float is the format of choice, as it's scaleable and (for all practical purposes) you can't exceed the clipping point. When re-sampling down (as would normally be required to make a CD) the rounding errors, which are present in both 16 and 24 bit systems do not occur.
The downside of all this is very large files, so you have to make a judgement call on the need to actually do this.
To pick up on oliverbuhr's question - you'll never see 32 bit hardware, since it's potential dynamic range far exceeds the physical possibility of construction. People who want/need to use 32bit float files upsample them in softwae (eg Adobe Audtion) before starting work.
Originally posted by jon-paul
[B]I only know this because i am doing a Degree in Music Production in England.
I don't know what they teach you guys these days, but someone doing a degree in music production really should know that the processes you are referring to are not called 'editing' - that's something else entirely.
I know this as someone who learned the business through practical application, not academia.
Graeme
05-10-2004, 11:41 AM
I should have also said, if you are truly only editing - ie cutting things up and re-positioning them - then it matters not one iota what format the track is in, since this process does not affect the quality, it will remain exactly the same.
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Release Candidate 2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.