Weil's Straw Men

[Arny Krueger]

"dave weil" <dweil@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:0qumkvg3hrffjgmlv9g09nku59bdhtqluf@4ax.com...

> >Atkinson, anybody with a brain knows that I refer to people by their last
> >name, friend, foe and neutral party alike.

Even a blithering idiot like you Weil should know that a few exceptions
don't make or break a rule.

This post:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Y1vWa.28604%24cF.10921%40rwcrnsc53

refers to Tom Nousaine as "Nousaine" and is far more recent than the one you
cited Weil, namely

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=OqS39.334%24hA7.23812413%40newssvr15.n e
ws.prodigy.com

So much for cherry-picked posts and stupid attempts to disprove a rule by
citing an exception or three.

Really lame, Weil. Grow a brain, will you?

[Rob Adelman]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> "dave weil" <dweil@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:0qumkvg3hrffjgmlv9g09nku59bdhtqluf@4ax.com...
>
>
>>>Atkinson, anybody with a brain knows that I refer to people by their last
>>>name, friend, foe and neutral party alike.
>
>
> Even a blithering idiot like you Weil should know that a few exceptions
> don't make or break a rule.

Umm, oh never mind..

[Arny Krueger]

Sorry about the RAO idiots gratuitous hijacking of this thread..


"Rob Adelman" <SPAMLESSradelman@mn.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bifvpb$90tg5$3@ID-75267.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> > "dave weil" <dweil@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:0qumkvg3hrffjgmlv9g09nku59bdhtqluf@4ax.com...
> >
> >
> >>>Atkinson, anybody with a brain knows that I refer to people by their
last
> >>>name, friend, foe and neutral party alike.
> >
> >
> > Even a blithering idiot like you Weil should know that a few exceptions
> > don't make or break a rule.
>
> Umm, oh never mind..
>

[dave weil]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:49:25 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

>
>"dave weil" <dweil@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:0qumkvg3hrffjgmlv9g09nku59bdhtqluf@4ax.com...
>
>> >Atkinson, anybody with a brain knows that I refer to people by their last
>> >name, friend, foe and neutral party alike.
>
>Even a blithering idiot like you Weil should know that a few exceptions
>don't make or break a rule.

Oh, it's now a RULE that you refer to people by their last name.

OK. Seems like a petty rule, especially since you didn't used to have
that rule. I remember when you used to refer to me as Mr. Weil.
However, all that changed when you finally noticed that I stopped
referring to you as Arny (which WAS deliberate since I didn't think
that you deserved the "cute" nickname). Suddenly you dropped the
honorific (in some bizarre backwards retaliation). Then you extended
it to everyone you disliked. While it's rather gratifying to know that
I exert a powerful influence on your family and behavior, it's a
little disturbing in a way.

>This post:
>
>http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Y1vWa.28604%24cF.10921%40rwcrnsc53
>
>refers to Tom Nousaine as "Nousaine" and is far more recent than the one you
>cited Weil, namely

But you weren't addressing him, were you?

That's the point that we're talking about, right?

Maybe you could find an example of you responding directly to Tom by
addressing him as Nousaine. I'm just curious if it's ever happened...

>http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=OqS39.334%24hA7.23812413%40newssvr15.n ews.prodigy.com
>
>So much for cherry-picked posts and stupid attempts to disprove a rule by
>citing an exception or three.
>
>Really lame, Weil. Grow a brain, will you?

This spin is far lamer than anything I've ever posted.

Basically, you're just a rather nasty piece of work and this sort of
behavior simply underscores it.

<shrug>